š½ļø Theater ads are depressing, but Deadpool was good
How Nike, Amazon, and Speak No Evil nearly ruined a wonderful experience
I donāt watch much in the way of television or movies these days, and neither does my husband. Between the two of us, we manage a few hours a week of Stardew Valley in the evenings, and thatās about it. We prioritize family meals and housework and reading books and long walks on Saturday mornings, which is nice. But we both enjoy Ryan Reynolds movies, and the occasion of our daughterās first birthday seemed like a good opportunity to sneak in a date. After we finished up with the pediatrician appointment ā timed awkwardly enough that we both ended up taking the day mostly off work ā we had lunch with a friend, left the baby at home, and went to the theater to see Deadpool vs. Wolverine.
The movie itself was great, and our local theater is a good one ā comfy seats, clean floors, pleasant patrons. But the ads nearly ruined the experience.
I donāt mean ads for Deadpool, either ā Ryan Reynolds knows what heās doing with that sort of thing, and besides, somehow weād both managed to avoid any spoilers. Iād learned about it from a Doritos package at my local grocery store. Not a lot of room there for a lengthy pitch. I walked into the theater knowing basically nothing about the movie beyond the fact that it starred Ryan Reynolds and Hugh Jackman.
No, the problem was that we got to the theater early enough to sit through some of the advertisements in addition to the previews. The early ones have always been sort of lame; weird games, beverage ads, āyour ad hereā type stuff. There were also a lot more government ads than I remembered ever seeing; not just the flashy cinematic military recruitment ones aimed at teens, but ads for in-state HBCUs and the government office youāre supposed to contact if you run afoul of housing discrimination. Not exactly feel-good content, but whatever.
Then came the Nike ad
I spent the first 90% of pretty convinced signalled the switched to previews ā I genuinely thought it was setting up a new Joker movie. It was a montage of various sports scenes with a sociopathic overtone reminiscent of Hannibal or Dexter. It was evidently supposed to be āa representation of Olympians' inner monologue as they excelā and ācelebrate what it takes to be a winner,ā but my goodness, maybe having the voice of the Green Goblin saying stuff like
āIām irrational, I have zero remorse, I have no sense of compassionā¦ I'm single-minded. I'm deceptive. I'm obsessive. I'm selfishā¦ I'm delusional. I'm maniacal. You think I'm a bad person? Tell me.ā
for 90 seconds, followed by a Nike logoā¦ immediately before a superhero movie, in order to sell shoes and other athletic clothing is a bad idea?
The kicker for me was that when I went to search up the advertisement, I searched āserial killer voice Nike adā and the guts of the internet served me an entirely different slasher movie parody ad from the 2000 version of Nike, which was so upsetting it got pulled from the Olympics. This āam I a bad personā ad is supposed to be Nikeās comeback moment or something ā back to their gritty controversial roots! ā and sure, I guess Iām talking about it, but most of what Iām got out of it was a visceral sense of what it feels like to watch a trainwreck.
To wit, I came across this LinkedIn post absolutely decimating the C-suite self-inflicted stupidity on Nikeās part. Apparently, Nike got rid of a bunch of their traditional categories and decided to focus solely on direct-to-consumer sales, which not only pissed off long-time partners and torched departments worth of expertise, it cratered brand loyalty and market share. Nikeās got enough long-standing reputation and financial value to hang on, but āan epic saga of value destructionā feels pretty accurate to me.
I am so incredibly over āthe bad guys are the good guys, actuallyā ā which brings me to
the preview for Wicked, the movie.
I remember when Wicked first came out; before Maleficent, before The Suicide Squad, before the gritty superhero trend. My best friend in high school absolutely loved the book, though somehow I never got around to reading it. A lot of people I know consider the musical among their absolute favorites, and I was primed to be excited because I just finished reading the first few books of Oz with my son. The visuals looked great, sort of a mix between Charlie & the Chocolate Factory and the Capitol scenes from The Hunger Games. But honestly, I found the trailer off-putting and it mostly made me want to go watch Legally Blonde again, because Iām getting tired of āpink femininityā being code for āvillanous bully.ā Elle Woods was delightfully subversive in her relationships with the women around her ā in the sense that everyone expected her to be a dumb blonde jealous of her ex-boyfriendās āserious brunetteā replacement girl, and instead Elle and Vivian become friends.
These days Iām all about movies that are, if not wholesome, at least have an underlying message that basically aligns with what I want to see in the world, what would feel good to fill my brain with. Wicked was cool back when it was subversive, when its message was āthere are consequences for messing with nerdsā or whatever. In a world saturated with Dolores Umbridge, Mean Girls and Effie Trinket, āpretty girls in pink are oblivious and cruelā is no longer subversive1. āYou have to be a sociopath to succeed, so buy our shoesā is not a message I want to see in the world.
The Amazon advertisement was a similar miss for me
ā¦not because it was sociopathic, but because it was depressing.
Amazon is convenient, and thatās a fact. But when the plot of your ad is āpretty young woman moves to a new city, watches TV alone in her empty apartment, gets inspired by the decor on the show and obsessively buys plants off of Amazon, then drinks coffee on her balcony ā which represents the only green space visible,ā it doesnāt strike me as inspiring.
They could have had a dude in it ā it could have been about a young couple starting a new life together, being happy and too busy doing something else to run out and get plantsā¦ but no, they're advertising to lonely women in big cities as their target audience. The adās protagonist might as well have ordered ten cats, plus litter and food, off of Amazon.
To be clear, Iām not dunking on anyone who moves to a big city and is too worn out or nervous to go out and explore the town at first, and Iām not dunking on single people or city dwellers or cat owners or whatever ā certainly if she were a real person I might have admired her green thumb and taste, and certainly I have owned cats and been single. Many of my friends spent big chunks of their lives in big cities. Iāve even bought plants off of Amazon to cheer up a space! I still have the little succulents in little owl pots I bought for the first classroom I ever had that actually sported windows.
But advertisements speak to culture, they are meant to resonate with a large audience with disposable income, to inspire them to spend money. If a huge number of American women are moving into small, lonely apartments in big cities so they can watch TV alone and pretend theyāre enjoying nature by filling their space with houseplants, oof. Where are the roommates? The trips to the bodega? The street sellers of exotic fruit and plants and artwork? The buskers, the rats stealing pizza slices, the profusion of life that represents the whole point of moving to a city.
I hate the idea that there are so many people in the situation of trying to brighten up a lonely, empty apartment, without help from friends or family or even chance-met strangers, that this ad seemed like a good idea.
It wasnāt the worst buzzkill of the experience, though. That distinction is reserved for
the Speak No Evil preview
James McAvoy (Charles Xavier himself!) as perpetrator of a psychological nightmare was not just a tone-deaf addition to the pre-Deadpool lineup, it came near to ruining the whole experience for me. Ever since my first pregnancy, itās been a lot harder for me to tolerate imagery involving violence against kids. Iām also just a lot more aware of my own vulnerability, now that Iāve experienced so many postpartum complications; sexualized violence against vulnerable women is more existentially disturbing than it used to be.
I donāt understand why it needs to be said, but here it is: Donāt show me existential horrors before a comedy flick!
Sure, Deadpool is inherently R-rated, and gory, and has loving odes to wanton destruction and sexualized, violent humor. But itās not threatening, itās tongue-in-cheek.
Speak No Evil is horror in the deeply disturbing sense, the āthis could maybe happen to youā sense ā not the āzombie apocalypse that inspires you to debate what kind of gun explodes a corpse head bestā sense. Genuine nightmare fuel, not jump scares and silly costumes.
The premise, which I gleaned entirely from the preview because I have no desire to learn more about it from a search engine, is essentially that nice family A meets nice family B on vacation in Europe, gets invited back to their beautiful rural home, then discovers that family B is not just sort of weirdly pushy about norms but actively evil, with creepy dad going in for creepy neck kisses on another manās wife, with close-up shots of an 8-year-old boy with his tongue cut out, with a weedy dweeby husband totally out of his depth when it comes to getting his family to safety once the phone lines are cut and his tires are slashed.
Absolutely nothing about watching a woman about my age desperately trying to keep a terrifying abuser away from herself and her kids put me in the mood to enjoy Deadpool. I used to think of ads as a bit of a waste of time, and looked forward to the previews. They were a nice chance to decide what to see the next time weāve got a chance. Now? I plan to carefully avoid all of it ā or just skip the theater entirely and watch good movies ad-free, cheaper and from the comfort of my own home.
Deadpool and Wolverine was a genuinely good movie, tho
On the whole Iām glad we went. It was good to get out of the house, away from the baby and chores, and have a laugh. Deadpool and Wolverine certainly didnāt blow my mind, and it wonāt be a movie that sticks with me forever, but days later I have no particular complaints and despite the ads I left the theater in a great mood. The nostalgia-bait was well-done, the moral at the end was reasonably wholesome, the action sequences were fun, and it was cool to see how Ryan Reynolds involved his family in the film.
It felt like a good entry in the Deadpool series and any niggling criticisms I might have about it feel nitpicky given that itās a Deadpool movie and not really meant to be taken seriously. I donāt see much point in reviewing the plot, or the acting, or the dialog, or whatever ā itās a Deadpool movie, you get what you expectā¦ though I will say that havenāt enjoyed a soundtrack this much since Guardians of the Galaxy.
I just wish Nike, Amazon, and Speak No Evil hadnāt tainted the experience for me.
Remember when Sandy Olsson from Grease was the quintessential good girl? Feels like a modern Hollywood version would do its darndest to turn her into the villain of a remake with all of Rizzoās mistakes presented as virtues.
The first time I saw ads in a theater was in the late 1970ās. The lights go down, the projector turns on, everyone quietens to watch the previews, and an ad comes on instead. Everyone in the theater started booing.
Found this interesting! I remember a friend talking about the reason Star Wars became so popular was that all the other lit and movies were depressing. Do you think we're in that kind of era again?